“Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God, the LORD is one. You shall love the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your might. [Deuteronomy 6.4]
and,
“…you shall love your neighbor as yourself: I am the LORD.” [Leviticus 19.18]
I said in a previous post that these two commands, which Jesus said are the greatest, are like “hooks” on a wall upon which the rest of the Law and Prophets hang on. Jesus says, “On these two commandments depend all the Law and the Prophets” – implying that without these two commands the Law and the Prophets are meaningless, and vice versa. You can read the rest of the post here.
In that post I also suggested that one reason why the Body of Messiah has been so divided over the years is because of a mishandling [to say it nicely] of the Law of God. The general consensus, especially among Evangelicals, is that the Law [given at Mt. Sinai] is not applicable to those who follow Jesus. Put in familiar terms, “Jesus did away with the Law.” The follow is not so much evidence for why I think that the Law is good, for our good, and most definitely for those who follow Jesus [Jew and Gentile alike]; rather, I wish to elaborate a bit on this statement I made:
…if we do not obey God according to what He’s already said we ought to do to love Him and our neighbor, then we are going to have to come up with our own “law” on what to obey in order to do this.
Every people needs a law. A law-less people live in anarchy, right? Every child needs laws, at least in order for that child to grow into a descent human being and for their potential to be drawn out, rather than snuffed. Every employer has rules; every contract has stipulations; every product has instructions; every healthy relationship has boundaries. Every people needs a law to live by in order for that people to function in a way that is positive rather than destructive.
God’s Kingdom is no different. In fact, I would go as far to say that God’s Law [which is meant to govern his subjects] is not simply a viable option among many that one can pick to follow. No, I would say that his Law is the epitome of Law; the paradigm with no possible way of shifting [cf. James 1.17]. This is not to say that we can literally observe all that exists in it, or even that it all literally applies to me, personally. I don’t menstruate; I’m not a Levite; I don’t have children, etc. Just like any law of any land, there are parts that apply to you, and there are some that do not. The essence and purpose of law is to establish and maintain shalom and righteousness [not a "saving" righteousness, but a righteousness between peoples].
Consider the creation of the Law in America [in the beginning anyway]. It was largely constructed from the principles found in God’s Law. Granted, it was not word for word; nonetheless they at least saw the beauty and “life” that existed in it. Why can’t we?
I believe this is where we first go wrong – not recognizing the beauty and life that God’s commandments possess and offer. And why don’t we? It seems that more often than not it is because we do not know, or are not familiar with what the Law even says! [When was the last time you heard a sermon on Leviticus 19?] Surely James [Jacob] saw God’s commands for what they were, which led him to call it the “perfect law,” and even the “law of liberty” [James 1.25; cf. Romans 7.12].
If we ignore God’s commands then we will create our own law, for we need law. If we, as God’s people, look to our own devices to come up with a law for us to follow, what does that communicate to the King? If we neglect the Law that our Master followed perfectly and created! – what does that imply? The traditional arguments employed to say the Law is done away with cannot be accepted simply on the basis of them not being logical, or consistent with traditional doctrine and especially the Scriptures themselves.
Therefore, the question we must entertain is not “Is the Law applicable to those who follow Jesus,” rather “What was the purpose of the Law?” and, “How can I obey?”